🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters applauding your advice on growing your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to explore opportunities?

If not, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Numerous women participated in a collective professional network test recently after popular discussions indicated that switching their profile gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to include what they called "bro-coded" language - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system favors men who use online business jargon.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which content appear to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how content perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your posts shows up in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", described extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her reach decrease significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Finally, she recycled previous content with comparable "agentic" language

The result was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - brief and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and confident - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after seven days, stating "Every day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all participants experienced favorable outcomes. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" described a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical content by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and spread posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."